Controlling 2D magnetism with stacking order Featured

MIT researchers answer puzzling question why magnetism in certain materials is different in atomically thin layers and their bulk forms.
MIT Physics graduate student Dahlia R. Klein, left, and postdoc David MacNeill. Photo, Denis Paiste, Materials Research Laboratory.
MIT Physics graduate student Dahlia R. Klein, left, and postdoc David MacNeill showed that the magnetic order and stacking order are very strongly linked in two-dimensional (2D) magnets such as chromium chloride and chromium iodide, giving engineers a tool to vary the material’s magnetic properties. Photo, Denis Paiste, Materials Research Laboratory.

Researchers led by MIT Physics Professor Pablo Jarillo-Herrero last year showed that rotating layers of hexagonally structured graphene at a particular “magic angle” could change the material’s electronic properties from an insulating state to a superconducting state. Now researchers in the same group and their collaborators have demonstrated that in a different ultra-thin material that also features a honeycomb-shaped atomic structure – chromium trichloride (CrCl3) – they can alter the material’s magnetic properties by shifting the stacking order of layers.

The researchers peeled away two-dimensional (2D) layers of chromium trichloride using tape in the same way researchers peel away graphene from graphite. Then they studied the 2D chromium trichloride’s magnetic properties using electron tunneling. They found that the magnetism is different in 2D and 3D crystals due to different stacking arrangements between atoms in adjacent layers.

At high temperatures, each chromium atom in chromium trichloride has a magnetic moment that fluctuates like a tiny compass needle. Experiments show that as the temperature drops below 14 Kelvin (-434.47 F), deep in the cryogenic temperature range, these magnetic moments freeze into an ordered pattern, pointing in opposite directions in alternating layers (antiferromagnetism). The magnetic direction of all the layers of chromium trichloride can be aligned by applying a magnetic field. But the researchers found that in its 2D form, this alignment needs a magnetic force 10 times stronger than in the 3D crystal. The results were recently published online in Nature Physics.

“What we’re seeing is that it’s 10 times harder to align the layers in the thin limit compared to the bulk, which we measure using electron tunneling in a magnetic field,” says MIT Physics graduate student Dahlia R. Klein, one of the paper’s lead authors. Klein is an NSF Graduate Research Fellow. Physicists call the energy required to align the magnetic direction of opposing layers the interlayer exchange interaction. “Another way to think of it is that the interlayer exchange interaction is how much the adjacent layers want to be anti-aligned,” fellow lead author and MIT postdoc David MacNeill suggests.

The researchers attribute this change in energy to the slightly different physical arrangement of the atoms in 2D chromium chloride. “The chromium atoms form a honeycomb structure in each layer, so it’s basically stacking the honeycombs in different ways,” Klein says. “The big thing is we’re proving that the magnetic and stacking orders are very strongly linked in these materials.”

"Our work highlights how the magnetic properties of 2D magnets can differ very substantially from their 3D counterparts,” says senior author Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, the Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics. “This means that we have now a new generation of highly tunable magnetic materials, with important implications for both new fundamental physics experiments and potential applications in spintronics and quantum information technologies."

Layers are very weakly coupled in these materials, known as van der Waals magnets, which is what makes it easy to remove a layer from the 3D crystal with adhesive tape. “Just like with graphene, the bonds within the layers are very strong but there are only very weak interactions between adjacent layers, so you can isolate few-layer samples using tape,” Klein says.

MacNeill and Klein grew the chromium chloride samples, built and tested nanoelectronic devices, and analyzed their results. The researchers also found that as chromium trichloride is cooled from room temperature to cryogenic temperatures, 3D crystals of the material undergo a structural transition that the 2D crystals do not. This structural difference accounts for the higher energy required to align the magnetism in the 2D crystals.

Chromium Trichloride DMacNeill
Bulk single crystal of chromium trichloride, a layered two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals antiferromagnet. Photo, David MacNeill, MIT.

The researchers measured the stacking order of 2D layers through the use of Raman spectroscopy and developed a mathematical model to explain the energy involved in changing the magnetic direction. Co-author and Harvard University postdoc Daniel T. Larson says he analyzed a plot of Raman data that showed variations in peak location with the rotation of the chromium trichloride sample, determining that the variation was caused by the stacking pattern of the layers. “Capitalizing on this connection, Dahlia and David have been able to use Raman spectroscopy to learn details about the crystal structure of their devices that would be very difficult to measure otherwise,” Larson explains. “I think this technique will be a very useful addition to the toolbox for studying ultra-thin structures and devices.” Materials Science and Engineering graduate student Qian Song carried out the Raman spectroscopy experiments in the lab of MIT Assistant Professor of Physics Riccardo Comin. Both also are co-authors of the paper.

“This research really highlights the importance of stacking order on understanding how these van der Waals magnets behave in the thin limit,” Klein says.

MacNeill adds, “The question of why the 2D crystals have different magnetic properties had been puzzling us for a long time. We were very excited to finally understand why this is happening, and it’s because of the structural transition.”

This work builds on two years of prior research into 2D magnets in which Jarillo-Herrero’s group collaborated with researchers at the University of Washington led by Professor Xiaodong Xu, who holds joint appointments in the departments of Materials Science & Engineering, Physics, and Electrical & Computer Engineering, and others. Their work, which was published in a Nature letter in June 2017, showed for the first time that a different material with a similar crystal structure – chromium triiodide (CrI3) – also behaved differently in the 2D form than in the bulk, with few-layer samples showing antiferromagnetism unlike the ferromagnetic 3D crystals.

Jarillo-Herrero’s group went on to show in a May 2018 Science paper that chromium triiodide exhibited a sharp change in electrical resistance in response to an applied magnetic field at low temperature. This work demonstrated that electron tunneling is a useful probe for studying magnetism of 2D crystals. Klein and MacNeill were also the first authors of this paper.

University of Washington Professor Xiaodong Xu says of the latest findings, “The work presents a very clever approach, namely the combined tunneling measurements with polarization resolved Raman spectroscopy. The former is sensitive to the interlayer antiferromagnetism, while the latter is a sensitive probe of crystal symmetry. This approach gives a new method to allow others in the community to uncover the magnetic properties of layered magnets.”

“This work is in concert with several other recently published works,” Xu says. “Together, these works uncover the unique opportunity provided by layered van der Waals magnets, namely engineering magnetic order via controlling stacking order. It is useful for arbitrary creation of new magnetic states, as well as for potential application in reconfigurable magnetic devices.”

Other authors contributing to this work include Efthimious Kaxiras, the John Hasbrouck Van Vleck Professor of Pure and Applied Physics at Harvard University; Harvard graduate student Shiang Fang; Iowa State University Distinguished Professor (Condensed Matter Physics) Paul C. Canfield; Iowa State graduate student Mingyu Xu; and Raquel A. Ribeiro, of Iowa State University and the Federal University of ABC, Santo André, Brazil. This work was supported in part by the Center for Integrated Quantum Materials; the DOE Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences; the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative; and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

back to newsletterDenis Paiste, Materials Research Laboratory
September 25, 2019

Contact Us

MIT Materials Research Laboratory
77 Massachusetts Avenue, 13-2106
Cambridge, MA 02139
617-253-5179
Email: mit-mrl@mit.edu